« Cora Foster's house fourteen months on | Main | Oh, hardee har har »

October 24, 2007

Control

[Minor spoilers ahead for people who don't know anything at all about Joy Division.]

The other night I got to see Control, the new biopic about Joy Division vocalist Ian Curtis, who took his own life in 1980 at the age of 23, thus sealing his status as an eternal rock legend.

I first learned about Joy Division from reading about his death in Creem Magazine, the summer after my 16th birthday. In fact, most of the cool music I first learned about was music that I only read about and never heard. I knew gobs about obscure bands like Joy Division and Panther Burns and Siouxsie and the Banshees and Gang of Four and the Alley Cats just because I'd read about them, because Robert Christgau had an opinion about them, and I rarely heard them because it was stuff that it was hard to hear at the time even on WTUL, and I didn't have much of a budget for buying music, especially expensive imports. But the short Creem blurb about Joy Division, their music, and Ian's death, accompanied by this haunting photo, really stuck with me. It felt like the Quadrophenia thing I talked about the other day, but taken to a much darker place, a place I hadn't been to yet but could see from here.

ian_curtis

In college, I became one of those kids who lived in the Joy Division world a little too deeply. When I was 19 I used to say, in all seriousness, that I hoped I didn't live to see 30 and that I would make sure I didn't. I was moody, I was depressed. (And chicks dug it, at least a few of them, which was an added bonus. Mysterious moody bad boy. Until they would get sick of my morose shit and dump me, which then further fed the beast.)

Seeing Control was a big deal for me. And on the heels of last week's Quadrophenia epiphany, on the eve of my teetering sobriety anniversary, it affected me deeply.

From a pure film critic point of view, you could probably pick it apart for a lackluster ending, for the lack of depth of character of the other band members.

None of that matters to me. Greg Peters has called this, with a hint of derision, "The Passion of the Christ", but for me, in trying to newly process my memories of my life as a 19-year-old vaguely suicidal alcoholic, it really was exactly that. I needed to see inside Ian's head. I needed to understand. I needed to know why.

And why, as it turns out, was a simple garden variety love triangle. Ian got married too young, before his art and his importance had flourished, and he fell out of love with the mother of his child and in love with somebody who would have been his soulmate if only he had waited a few more years to meet her. And his epilepsy and other health problems prevented him from dealing emotionally with the complications of living in the fucked up situation he had place himself in. And one night, in a moment of great pain and pressure and confusion and weakness, he hung himself.

So when you see the movie and re-listen to the music in the context of what was going on in his life, you realize that what he did was pour his feelings and his doubts and his regrets into his songs. Literally. Literally in the extreme. When he writes in "Love Will Tear Us Apart":

When routine bites hard,
And ambitions are low,
And resentment rides high
But emotions won't grow,
And we're changing our ways,
Taking different roads,
Then love, love will tear us apart again

Why is the bedroom so cold?
Turned away on your side.
Is my timing that flawed,
Our respect run so dry?
Yet there's still this appeal
That we've kept through our lives
And love, love will tear us apart again

he is writing about his wife, and he knows his wife knows he is writing about her, and she knows that the whole world knows that he is writing about her. But he wrote and recorded it anyway.

As art, it is a profound piece of work.

As a way to treat a person you love...it seems morally questionable. Is inflicting pain like this somehow justified if great music or literature or art is the result?

Yet, if you strip out all the interpersonal relationship complications and all the regret and pain from Ian's lyrics, you're not left with fucking much else besides "dance dance dance dance dance to the radio". If all that emotional raw material was not available to him as a lyricist, then likely nobody would have ever heard of Joy Division, nobody would have ever made a movie about them, and I wouldn't be writing a blog post trying to explain why this is all so personally important.

So what the fuck does all this have to do with me?

Because I've been wrestling with these very issues for a long time. Some of you may remember that I did a big purge of some archives of my blog a year or so ago because I wrote some things there that hurt some people that I love very much, not expecting that they would ever read them. And so certain topics and certain people are no longer discussed here, because the risk is too great.

I have coworkers who have found my blog. My wife's coworkers and derby friends read it. My parents and possibly my brothers and for all I know my kids friends from school read this stuff. So my blog slowly constricts down to that which is safe, which is inoffensive, non-worrisome, and family-hour friendly. Circe said to me a few years ago, "your blog is just brochure-ware now...you post about bands you like and movies you saw and you link to funny pictures you found on the internet, but you don't actually say anything any more. Your blog is just a brochure of Ray". As if I were a hotel chain now, and this is just an inoffensive and inviting protrayal about what a fun and interesting guy Ray is. Hotel Ray is kid-friendly, serves crawfish ettoufee in the main restaurant, has Mission of Burma karaoke every Tuesday, and shows all the Red Sox games in the Sporty Sport bar on the mezzanine.

But it's just a blog, right? I mean, who cares? But the same conflict holds true for any kind of writing, and that is where I am really struggling. I want to be a writer. Published and all. I have one published work under my belt, a humorous little memoir about working as a float grunt during Mardi Gras in the 70's, which was published right after the storm by Chin Music Press. That story worked because I am pretty good at telling true stories in a funny and entertaining and only slightly embellished way. I want to write more; I've got a short story in progress, and a short speculative fiction novel taking shape in my head. But I write best when I write what I know, when I base my writing, at least loosely, on things that have actually happened to me or to people I know.

But other than a handful of humorous anecdotes, the really important, real literature-worthy things that I've experienced, are things that must remain private.

I can't do what Augusten Burroughs did in Running With Scissors or Dry. I can't just let fly on everybody I know, burn every bridge, and let the chips fall where they may. There are people involved, people I love, people I don't want to hurt. I want to write painful stories, but those stories are painful for other people too, not just me.

So I don't write anything interesting. I'm crap for making stuff up completely out of whole cloth. I can't do pure fiction the way somebody like Stephen King or William Gibson can. There has to be some of me in there or the words just don't come.

I don't know the way out of this conunudrum. I wrestle with emotional issues as significant as Ian Curtis...different ones, to be sure, but just as significant...but I am bound by duty to family and friends, and by rules of social and workplace decorum not to write about them.

I think I'll figure it out. Maybe I'll find my fiction voice one of these days. But right now it's fucking hard.

In the meantime, I am going to try, try really hard, to not let this blog be brochureware all the damn time.

[P.S. I feel I must add that if you read the above and try to infer anything about my marriage or my relationship with any of my family members or friends or any of my past relationships...if you think you know what specific people or events or experiences I am referring to...you're wrong. You just read my blog. None of you really know me. Not all of me.]

Posted by ray at October 24, 2007 12:30 AM |
Categories: [ | | | ]
Tags:

Comments

How can any one of us state that we know the operating system of another?

You are a good egg on it's own path. There are ups and downs, but you are one of those who will look and grasp the good.

And your Blog becoming brochure ware, spare me Darlin', some of your posts have made me look upward and outward.

And no... speaking for myself, I'll never know all of you, but the discovery will be wonderful and a great journey.

Things happen in their own ways...

Posted by: GentillyGirl at October 24, 2007 3:02 AM

Brochure-ware, my ass.

Keep plugging away in your own way. Damn the torpedoes.

Posted by: liprap at October 24, 2007 6:51 AM

You might be able to ingeniously disguise the people and places in your fiction so that they would never ever recognize themselves in those places. There are thin veils and thicker ones.
I don't buy that brochure schlock either.

Posted by: Marco at October 24, 2007 8:24 AM

I'm fighting this same issue myself. I can write cute little stories about my hilarious family members, and blog entries about movies, but there's part of me that feels I'm not going to go anywhere until I pry open some of the darker stuff and let it out.

I figure the best thing for me to do is write it the way I want to write it, warts and all, let it fly ... but then re-edit and reshape that material so it will be emotionally honest without hurting anyone's feelings. But I still haven't reached the point where I'm actually *doing* this yet.

Posted by: Jette at October 24, 2007 10:13 AM

But I write best when I write what I know, when I base my writing, at least loosely, on things that have actually happened to me or to people I know.

I think that your experiences might be broader and deeper than you know, so this may not be such a limiting factor.

And as for being "just a blog" -- I think people denigrate electronic media way too much, and bloggers who are good writers always seem to be apologizing for having a blog. Whadever. Quality writing is quality writing whatever the medium is, whether the words appear on paper or in bits and bytes. And a blog is a good testing ground.

I think what's important is that *you* feel like you're being inauthentic here. Anyway, I'm looking forward to reading you as you move your way toward authenticity.

Posted by: Hiromi at October 24, 2007 10:28 AM

Ray, I'll have more to day about this, but I have to make something clear: There was no derision in my tone -- I was serious. I've been where you've been, down to the details: depression, booze, darkness, stunted creativity, etc. For some reason, I've always found something in JD's music that kept my spark -- and me -- alive.

I grew up in the frozen far north, and the first miunte of "Atmospheres" puts me back there, walking out into a silent, white, -25 degree day. I can barely listen to "I Remember Nothing" without getting shaky in the knees and remembering the worst of the worst of times. I think "Love Will Tear Us Apart" is one of the greatest pop songs ever written.

Misery loves company. I love Joy Division.

Posted by: gregp at October 24, 2007 11:06 AM

Ray, you write what you write and you write it well. It's a tough balance, trying to write something that's emotionally honest without hurting those you love. I can't do it, which is one of the reasons I don't post anything as emotional as I used to post.

Count me in with the "Brochure-ware, my ass" folks (thanks, liprap). You still make me think and you still make me feel when I read your stuff. That can never be bad.

Posted by: Carol Elaine at October 24, 2007 11:08 AM

Thanks, y'all. Even when I posted this, I thought it might sound like so much self-indulgent navel-gazing bullshit, so I appreciate the support.

In Circe's defense, she said what she said during a period in my life when it was true...I wrote meaningful stuff early in my blog, and then for a while I stopped because the stuff I wanted to talk about wasn't for public consumption. And then Katrina happened, and the game changed for all of us, permanently.

And Greg, sorry about the paranoia. You remember what it was like, though. Us JD kids, we were the emo kids of our generation, objects of ridicule by the "normies" in the punk/indie world, the ones who seemed to effortlessly skate through life with energy and confidence. I suppose I should have given you more credit than that. And when you see the movie, it's gonna whomp you upside your head.

Posted by: Ray at October 24, 2007 1:44 PM

Since you started with a musical theme, a little musical hug:

And he's kind of like a poet
Who finds it hard to speak
Poems come so slowly
Like the colors down a sheet

He opens his mouth to speak and
What comes out's a mystery
Thought about, not understood
He's achin' to be

And I guess my answer to you could be encapsulated as:

I've been achin' for a while now, friend
I've been achin' hard for years...

For a longer answer:

I think this is a struggle for many, many writers. I struggle with it myself. I didn't when I was younger. Now, after many things have happened it's a bit like having had one's voice taken away, after you remember having it.

Except I'm finally getting it isn't taken away in the end. The voice IS there, and no one took it away except me. And that's weird to realize--that I'm the only one who's *really* invested in ensuring I keep my own mouth sealed shut.

For me, I think I'm slowly coming to feel that there's a fear there. A fear that keeps the block on and that has kept me feeling like I've been opening my mouth to say something and no sound can come out. I've told myself many a time it's really about consideration of other people's feelings, or just being too busy/overwhelmed with other mundane-but-necessary life things to get around to speaking up. But, I'm slowly beginning to realize it's less about that than that I'm fucking terrified to speak my truths out loud (a.k.a., write). And that ultimately, far more than protecting others' feelings, it's about the fear of my *own* feelings--fear of what will happen to ME if I say what I *really* feel, rather than spout off someone else's brand of truth (or just keep myself shut the fuck up and do neither). Fear of what will happen to *me* if someone chooses to be hurt by how I feel, or how I express myself.

Slowly over time in situations other than writing ones, I've begun to say things to people I never thought I would say--telling them how I feel when I've been terrified to do so, and of what the outcome would be. And through that, I've discovered that nothing can happen to me unless I choose it to happen. And nothing can happen to me that I can't be okay with if I'm ready to be okay with it, or work to be okay with it. I've found, MUCH to my surprise, that speaking honestly can't and doesn't destroy me or those around me. And that in fact, although the initial conversations weren't always happy, often the people I thought I would most hurt by being honest with have ended up telling me they've been waiting for years for someone to just come out and say something, because they weren't brave enough to do it themselves.

In almost all instances so far when I've spoken authentically and honestly without any intention to hurt, but just to express my own feelings and needs, it has brought me so many good things. My life has improved vastly as a result. And even in situations where the outcome wasn't as great I had desired, I found I wasn't as scared and hurt and feeling empty as I thought I would be--certainly not nearly as much as I had been when I just sat there depressed over it but saying nothing. And my recovery was much faster and much stronger.

So I'm thinking, this is something I might want to apply to my writing and formal creative expression, too--the last big fear I've not tackled.

There are certainly legitimate reasons for me to have these fears I spoke about. And there are dangers involved with either choice--speak up or keep silent. But are there benefits to both? To me, if i'm going to be 100% honest, while both have drawbacks, the benefits seem solely on one side.

So Ray, as one writer to another: Given the choice between screaming into a void with no sound for the rest of our lives, or getting to speak in our own voices and allowing people (including the people we love) to know us, really KNOW us, and how we feel...

Who you gonna call?

I guess I'm getting a lot more solid on which of those two choices I think I want. It's scary as hell, and it's gonna be hard to figure out how to do it, when I'm so used to the other way of doing things, but hell...I've been through a lot of shit. Compared to feeling depressed and without any voice or power at all, I suspect this will feel like a breeze.

Posted by: Miss Syl at October 24, 2007 3:35 PM

For me, it's catharsis through blogging. So mine is more of an annotated encyclopaedia than a brochure. That's not necessarily a good thing, either.

Posted by: ashley at October 24, 2007 11:03 PM

Hey, I have similar issues with blogging.

I just want to tell you: It's OK to write stuff that's not OK for some people to read. That's what pen names are for. That's what private/restricted entries are for. That's what *fiction* is for.

I don't know you beyond a comment you made in a blog I read, and this post I just read in your blog, but somehow I imagine right now you're shaking your head and saying, "Yes, I know that, but..." so I'm going to say it one more time:

It is OK to write stuff that's not OK for some people to read.

Not only can writers NOT get good with the superego in charge, writers can also not get good without some validation, endorsement, and unconditional approval. So, here I am, a total stranger, coming to tell you: You're OK. Go on and write the things.

Hell, if you have to, you can email them to me to read. I don't know your life, I don't know your friends, or your kids, or any of that. I wouldn't know if you were sending me fact or fiction anyway.

Posted by: Holly at October 25, 2007 3:53 AM

I understand what you mean. It's why I started blogging, to write about those things that were so painful, so difficult, that there was no talking about them, at least not any longer ('cause folks had tired of listening and therapists wouldn't keep me past a couple of years unless I, well, left him). I never got it done (writing about *that* on my blog), finding myself somehow unable to put it out there even when no one was reading. When I try to ficitionalize it all, well, it's still recognizable for those who matter and it's so extreme that it's not believable. I can't write fiction anyway, either.

Finally, I'm with Leigh'n'em. I know brochure blog and this is no brochure blog.

You be da Ray.

Posted by: Sophmom at October 28, 2007 1:06 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)